From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Brandle's Estate

Supreme Court of Florida, en Banc
May 8, 1953
65 So. 2d 27 (Fla. 1953)

Opinion

May 8, 1953.

Appeal from the County Judge of Dade County.

Harry W. Prebish and S. Blair Ross and Erstling Zuckerman, Miami, for appellants.

Ernest P. Jones and George L. Knight, Miami, for appellee.


This is an appeal from an order of the Circuit Judge of Dade County, affirming a final order of the County Judge of Dade County, adjudicating that a bank account in the Dade Federal Savings and Loan Association of Miami in the name of George J. Brandle and Louise Vondervied was an account held by them as joint tenants with the right of survivorship and not as tenants in common. There were three documents which must be construed together in determining whether or not the account was held by the parties as joint tenants with the right of survivorship, or as tenants in common.

There was an application for membership, signed by each of the parties. There is no question of the authenticity of the signatures. The application for membership contained the following:

"Membership of joint holders (with right of survivorship) of a share account."

The words "as joint tenants with the right of survivorship and not as tenants in common" appear twice in the application. The second document is a card which is sometimes referred to as the ledger. It is under the name of each of the parties and at the bottom of the ledger sheet the following words appear, "as joint tenants with the right of survivorship and not as tenants in common * * * Either of the Above Holders May Withdraw From the Account". The third document is a bank book which certifies to a saving share account in the name of each of the parties and with the words "Either of the Above Holders May Withdraw From This Account". On the second page of this book the following appears, George J. Brandle or (Miss) Louise Vondervied as joint tenants with the right of survivorship and not as tenants in common."

It appears from the record that Brandle requested Miss Louise Vondervied to sign and return the application. She did sign and return the application and thereby agreed to the terms and conditions set forth therein.

The appellant calls particular attention to section 689.15, F.S., F.S.A., which provides that an individual "transfer or conveyance heretofore or hereafter made to two or more shall create a tenancy in common, unless the instrument creating the estate shall expressly provide for the right of survivorship". In this case the three instruments above described expressly provide for the right of survivorship. The cases of Crabtree v. Garcia, Fla., 43 So.2d 466; Hagerty v. Hagerty, Fla., 52 So.2d 432, and Crawford v. McGraw, Fla., 61 So.2d 484, are controlling in this case.

Affirmed.

ROBERTS, C.J., and TERRELL, THOMAS, HOBSON and DREW, JJ., concur.

SEBRING, J., dissents.


Summaries of

In re Brandle's Estate

Supreme Court of Florida, en Banc
May 8, 1953
65 So. 2d 27 (Fla. 1953)
Case details for

In re Brandle's Estate

Case Details

Full title:IN RE BRANDLE'S ESTATE

Court:Supreme Court of Florida, en Banc

Date published: May 8, 1953

Citations

65 So. 2d 27 (Fla. 1953)

Citing Cases

Spark v. Canny

Testimony on the issues thus made was submitted to a Special Master (who did not, however, have authority to…

North Shore Bank v. Shea

The Supreme Court, in an opinion written by Mr. Justice Roberts, said: "This court apparently follows the…