From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Booker

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Mar 14, 1988
186 Ga. App. 614 (Ga. Ct. App. 1988)

Summary

dismissing appeal from judgment of contempt as untimely under OCGA § 5–6–38

Summary of this case from Bankston v. Lachman

Opinion

75150.

DECIDED MARCH 14, 1988. REHEARING DENIED MARCH 31, 1988.

Contempt. Wilkes Superior Court. Before Judge Stevens.

M. V. Booker, pro se.

Dennis C. Sanders, District Attorney, for appellee.


By means of an order filed December 9, 1986, the trial court adjudged M. V. Booker, an attorney, to be in wilful contempt of court. On March 18, 1987, the trial court denied Booker's motion to set aside the judgment, as well as her motion to recuse the trial judge. On April 6, 1987, Booker then filed with this court an application for review of the December order holding her in contempt. The application for review was dismissed because an order finding one in contempt of court is a subject for direct appeal. OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (2); Ramsey v. Ramsey, 231 Ga. 334 (1) ( 201 S.E.2d 429) (1973). On April 10, 1987, the day her application for leave to appeal was dismissed, Booker filed a notice of appeal "from the order of court rendered March 16, 1987, ... holding her in contempt of court and denying her Motion to Set Aside Judgment and Motion to Recuse."

The orders of March 16, 1987, referenced in Booker's notice of appeal, were filed March 18, 1987, and deny Booker's motion to recuse and motion to set aside the judgment of contempt. The appeal from the denial of a motion to set aside a judgment requires an application for discretionary review. OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (8). The appeal from an order denying a motion to recuse requires an application for interlocutory review. See Isaacs v. State, 257 Ga. 126 ( 355 S.E.2d 644) (1987). Booker followed neither procedure with regard to the orders of which she now seeks review, and accordingly her appeal with regard to those rulings must be dismissed because noncompliance with those procedures leaves this court without jurisdiction to consider an appeal. Echols v. State, 163 Ga. App. 905 ( 296 S.E.2d 366) (1982); Hogan v. Taylor County Bd. of Education, 157 Ga. App. 680 ( 278 S.E.2d 106) (1981). The order holding Booker in contempt, from which a direct appeal may be taken (OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (2)), was filed December 9, 1986. Booker's notice of appeal, filed April 10, 1987, was untimely, and therefore that portion of the appeal must also be dismissed. OCGA § 5-6-38 (a); Quarterman v. Quarterman, 170 Ga. App. 376 (1) ( 317 S.E.2d 206) (1984).

Appeal dismissed. Banke, P. J., and Carley, J., concur.

DECIDED MARCH 14, 1988 — REHEARING DENIED MARCH 31, 1988 — CERT. APPLIED FOR.


Summaries of

In re Booker

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Mar 14, 1988
186 Ga. App. 614 (Ga. Ct. App. 1988)

dismissing appeal from judgment of contempt as untimely under OCGA § 5–6–38

Summary of this case from Bankston v. Lachman

dismissing appeal of judgment of contempt as untimely

Summary of this case from Bankston v. Lachman
Case details for

In re Booker

Case Details

Full title:IN RE BOOKER

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Mar 14, 1988

Citations

186 Ga. App. 614 (Ga. Ct. App. 1988)
367 S.E.2d 850

Citing Cases

Rolleston v. Glynn County Board of Tax Assessors

Indeed, the order itself provides that the case shall "remain in active status" pending the outcome of the…

Manning v. MNC Consumer Discount Co.

1. Contrary to MNC's motion to dismiss, a direct appeal may be taken from an order holding one in contempt of…