In re Blust

Full title: In the Matter of PETER FRANCIS BLUST

Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Dec 8, 2023

3011 Disciplinary Docket 3 (Pa. Dec. 8, 2023)

Opinion

3011 Disciplinary Docket 3 146 DB 2023

12-08-2023

In the Matter of PETER FRANCIS BLUST

PER CURIAM

(Court of Common Pleas of Bucks County, No. CP-09-CR-0002238-2022)

Attorney Registration No. 47072 (Philadelphia)

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 8^th day of December, 2023, having received no response to a rule to show cause why Respondent Peter Francis Blust should not be placed on temporary suspension, the Rule is made absolute, and Respondent is placed on temporary suspension. See Pa.R.D.E. 214(d)(2). Respondent shall comply with the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217.

Respondent's right to petition for dissolution or amendment of this Order and to request accelerated disposition of any charges underlying this Order pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 214(d)(4) and (f)(2) are specifically preserved.

This Order constitutes an imposition of public discipline. See Pa.R.D.E. 402(c)(2) (providing an exception to the confidentiality requirement of Rule 402 when "the investigation is predicated upon a conviction of the respondent-attorney for a crime").