From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Bishop

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Oct 24, 1991
588 So. 2d 376 (La. 1991)

Opinion

No. 91-B-1597.

October 24, 1991.

Louis Daniel Bishop, Jr., Tommy C. Rutledge, De Quincy, for respondent.

James Reed Barrow, G. Fred Ours, Elizabeth A. Alston, New Orleans, for LSBA.


DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING


Upon review of the findings and recommendations of Hearing Committee 5 and of the Disciplinary Board, and upon consideration of the evidence and of the briefs of the parties and of the record and oral argument, it is the decision of the Court that the Disciplinary Board's recommendations be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ordered that L. Daniel Bishop, Jr. be suspended from the practice of law in Louisiana for a period of three years from the finality of this decision. It is further ordered that respondent make full restitution in the amount of $3,847.99, together with legal interest from the date of his receipt of the client's funds until paid. Respondent's payment of full restitution or efforts to make restitution will be considered if respondent applies for readmission. All costs of this proceeding are assessed to respondent.


Summaries of

In re Bishop

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Oct 24, 1991
588 So. 2d 376 (La. 1991)
Case details for

In re Bishop

Case Details

Full title:IN RE L. DANIEL BISHOP, JR

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: Oct 24, 1991

Citations

588 So. 2d 376 (La. 1991)

Citing Cases

In re Huddleston

On the other hand, when any party objected to the Disciplinary Board's report and recommendation, the matter…