From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Bigler v. Cornell University

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 18, 1999
266 A.D.2d 92 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

November 18, 1999

Jeffrey M. Duban for Petitioner.

James R. Kahn for Respondent.

TOM, J.P., ANDRIAS, SAXE, FRIEDMAN, JJ.


Application pursuant to CPLR article 78, (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Louis York, J.], entered March 12, 1999), to annul respondent medical college's determination terminating petitioner's tenured employment on its faculty, unanimously denied, and the petition dismissed, without costs.

The petition should not have been transferred to this Court because it does not seek review of a determination made "as a result of a hearing held . . . pursuant to direction by law" (CPLR 7803), and also because the hearing on the charges against petitioner was not determinative but merely advisory to respondent's President and Board of Trustees (see, Matter of Kaufman v. Anker, 42 N.Y.2d 835). This Court will nevertheless undertake the review that should have been done by Supreme Court (see, Matter of 125 Bar Corp. v. State Liq. Auth., 24 N.Y.2d 174, 180). It is well settled that courts should not "invade, and only rarely assume academic oversight, except with the greatest caution and restraint, in such sensitive areas as faculty appointment, promotion, and tenure, especially in institutions of higher learning" (Matter of Pace Coll. v. Commission on Human Rights, 38 N.Y.2d 28, 38; see also, Gertler v. Goodgold, 107 A.D.2d 481, 486, affd 66 N.Y.2d 946; Matter of Loebl v. New York Univ., 255 A.D.2d 257). The findings of the hearing board that petitioner had failed to fulfill his faculty duties over an extended period of time was amply supported by the evidence, and the determination by the Board of Trustees to revoke petitioner's tenure and dismiss him from the faculty was not arbitrary and capricious (see, Matter of Kaufman v. Anker, supra).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

In re Bigler v. Cornell University

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 18, 1999
266 A.D.2d 92 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

In re Bigler v. Cornell University

Case Details

Full title:In re RODNEY E. BIGLER, PH.D, Petitioner, v. CORNELL UNIVERSITY, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 18, 1999

Citations

266 A.D.2d 92 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
698 N.Y.S.2d 472

Citing Cases

Storman v. N.Y.C. Dep't of Educ.

This is error as it “should not have been transferred because it did not seek review of a determination made…

Matter of Fruehwald v. Hofstra Univ.

The standard for judicial review The courts should not "invade, and only rarely assume academic oversight,…