From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Bell

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Nov 21, 2019
No. 05-19-01200-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 21, 2019)

Opinion

No. 05-19-01200-CV

11-21-2019

IN RE CANDACE BELL, Relator


Original Proceeding from the 256th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. DF-15-12975

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Whitehill, Partida-Kipness, and Pedersen
Opinion by Justice Whitehill

Before the court is relator's petition for writ of mandamus. Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relator to show both that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that relators have no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). After reviewing the petition for writ of mandamus and the applicable law, we conclude relator has not shown she is entitled to the relief requested. Accordingly, we deny relator's petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a) (the court must deny the petition if the court determines relator is not entitled to the relief sought).

/Bill Whitehill/

BILL WHITEHILL

JUSTICE 191200F.P05


Summaries of

In re Bell

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Nov 21, 2019
No. 05-19-01200-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 21, 2019)
Case details for

In re Bell

Case Details

Full title:IN RE CANDACE BELL, Relator

Court:Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Date published: Nov 21, 2019

Citations

No. 05-19-01200-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 21, 2019)