From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Bell

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Feb 5, 2008
No. 07-5395 (D.C. Cir. Feb. 5, 2008)

Opinion

No. 07-5395.

Filed On: February 5, 2008.

BEFORE: Ginsburg, Chief Judge, and Randolph and Tatel, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

Upon consideration of this court's order filed December 6, 2007, and the response thereto (styled as a "request for correction of Clerk's error"), it is

ORDERED that petitioner either pay the $450 docketing fee or file a motion for leave to file in forma pauperis within 30 days of the date of this order. Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of the petition for lack of prosecution. See D.C. Cir. Rule 38. Petitioner is advised that although the order referred to his petition as a mandamus petition because it seeks relief in the nature of an extraordinary writ, it has also been docketed as a petition for writ of habeas corpus.

The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this order to petitioner by whatever means necessary to ensure receipt.


Summaries of

In re Bell

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Feb 5, 2008
No. 07-5395 (D.C. Cir. Feb. 5, 2008)
Case details for

In re Bell

Case Details

Full title:In re: Jim Bell, Petitioner

Court:United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit

Date published: Feb 5, 2008

Citations

No. 07-5395 (D.C. Cir. Feb. 5, 2008)