From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Beach

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 23, 1934
263 N.Y. 676 (N.Y. 1934)

Opinion

Argued January 9, 1934

Decided January 23, 1934

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

William Warren Dimmick and Samuel Israel for Wilson Company, appellant.

John J. Bennett, Jr., Attorney-General ( John R. O'Hanlon and Henry Epstein of counsel), for State Industrial Board, appellant.

William B. Davis and E.C. Sherwood for The Travelers Insurance Company, respondent.


Order of the Appellate Division reversed and award of the State Industrial Board affirmed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division against the insurance carrier. The finding of the State Industrial Board that the payments were advancements of compensation should not be disturbed. (Workmen's Compensation Law [Cons. Laws, ch. 67], § 23.) The State Industrial Board had authority to make the award. (Workmen's Compensation Law, § 25.) No opinion.

Concur: POUND, Ch. J., CRANE, LEHMAN, KELLOGG, O'BRIEN, HUBBS and CROUCH, JJ.


Summaries of

In re Beach

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 23, 1934
263 N.Y. 676 (N.Y. 1934)
Case details for

In re Beach

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of HARRY BEACH, Respondent, against THE…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 23, 1934

Citations

263 N.Y. 676 (N.Y. 1934)
189 N.E. 753

Citing Cases

Matter of Beach v. Travelers Insurance Company

I think the determination of the Industrial Board was right and just and that we should affirm it. Revd., 263…