From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re B.C.C.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont
Feb 9, 2023
No. 09-23-00001-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 9, 2023)

Opinion

09-23-00001-CV

02-09-2023

IN THE INTEREST OF B.C.C.


Submitted on February 8, 2023.

On Appeal from the 317th District Court Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. C-224,292-E.

Before Golemon, C.J., Johnson and Wright, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

D.C. filed a notice of appeal from an order denying a motion to abate. We questioned whether the trial court had signed a final judgment or an order that is appealable as an accelerated appeal. D.C. and the Office of the Attorney General filed a response to our request, and both agree the trial court's order is an interlocutory order that is not appealable as an accelerated appeal. D.C. requests that we retain this matter as an original proceeding for a writ of mandamus, but he has not filed a brief that we could consider as a mandamus petition. Under these circumstances, judicial efficiency will be served by dismissing the attempted appeal without reference to the merits and without prejudice to D.C.'s right to seek mandamus relief by filing a Petition for Writ of Mandamus. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a); 43.2(f).

To protect the privacy of the parties, we refer to the child and the parties by their initials only. See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 109.002(d).

APPEAL DISMISSED.


Summaries of

In re B.C.C.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont
Feb 9, 2023
No. 09-23-00001-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 9, 2023)
Case details for

In re B.C.C.

Case Details

Full title:IN THE INTEREST OF B.C.C.

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont

Date published: Feb 9, 2023

Citations

No. 09-23-00001-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 9, 2023)