From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Baycol Products Liability Litigation

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio
Aug 9, 2002
Docket No. 1431, C.A. No. 2:02-144 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 9, 2002)

Opinion

Docket No. 1431, C.A. No. 2:02-144

August 9, 2002

BEFORE WM. TERRELL HODGES, CHAIRMAN, JOHN F. KEENAN, MOREY L. SEAR, BRUCE M. SELYA,[*] JULIA SMITH GIBBONS, D. LOWELL JENSEN AND J. FREDERICK MOTZ, JUDGES OF THE PANEL

Judges Sear and Selya took no part in the decision of this matter.


TRANSFER ORDER


Before the Panel are motions brought, respectively, by plaintiffs in the actions before the Panel, pursuant to Rule 7.4, R.P.J.P.M.L., 199 F.R.D. 425, 435-36 (2001), to vacate the orders conditionally transferring the actions to the District of Minnesota for inclusion in the coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings occurring there in this docket. Defendant Bayer Corporation opposes the motions to vacate and favors inclusion of the actions in MDL-1431.

On the basis of the papers filed and hearing session held, the Panel finds that these six actions involve common questions of fact with the actions in this litigation previously transferred to the District of Minnesota, and that transfer of these six actions to the District of Minnesota for inclusion in the coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings in that district will serve the convenience of the parties and witnesses and promote the just and efficient conduct of the litigation. The Panel further finds that transfer of these six actions is appropriate for reasons expressed by the Panel in its original order directing centralization in this docket. The Panel held that the District of Minnesota was the proper Section 1407 forum for actions involving claims of liability relating to the prescription drug Baycol. See In re Baycol Products Liability Litigation, 180 F. Supp.2d 1378 (J.P.M.L. 2001). We note that any motions for remand to state court can be presented to and decided by the transferee court. See, e.g., In re Ivy, 901 F.2d 7 (2nd Cir. 1990); In re Prudential Insurance Company of America Sales Practices Litigation, 170 F. Supp.2d 1346, 1347-48 (J.P.M.L. 2001).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, these six actions are transferred to the District of Minnesota and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Michael J. Davis for inclusion in the coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings occurring there in this docket.


Summaries of

In re Baycol Products Liability Litigation

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio
Aug 9, 2002
Docket No. 1431, C.A. No. 2:02-144 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 9, 2002)
Case details for

In re Baycol Products Liability Litigation

Case Details

Full title:IN RE BAYCOL PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION Paul Duda v. Bayer AG, et al

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio

Date published: Aug 9, 2002

Citations

Docket No. 1431, C.A. No. 2:02-144 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 9, 2002)