From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Bartok

Supreme Court of Ohio
Apr 19, 2010
124 Ohio St. 3d 1550 (Ohio 2010)

Opinion

No. 2010-0180.

April 19, 2010.

Cuyahoga App. No. 92775.


MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal. On November 13, 2009, appellant filed a notice that a motion to certify a conflict was pending in the court of appeals and, pursuant to S.Ct.Prac. R. 4.4(A)(4), this court stayed consideration of the jurisdictional memoranda filed in this appeal. Whereas appellant has neither notified this court that the court of appeals determined that a conflict does not exist as provided by S.Ct.Prac. R. 4.4(B) nor filed a copy of the court of appeals' order certifying the existence of a conflict as provided by S.Ct.Prac. R. 4.4(C), It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that appellant show cause within fourteen days of the date of this entry why this court should not proceed to consider the jurisdictional memoranda in this appeal pursuant to S.Ct.Prac. R. 3.6.

PFEIFER, Acting C.J.


Summaries of

In re Bartok

Supreme Court of Ohio
Apr 19, 2010
124 Ohio St. 3d 1550 (Ohio 2010)
Case details for

In re Bartok

Case Details

Full title:In re Bartok

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Apr 19, 2010

Citations

124 Ohio St. 3d 1550 (Ohio 2010)
2010 Ohio 1709