From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Bartholomew

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
Dec 8, 2020
305 So. 3d 848 (La. 2020)

Opinion

No. 2020-B-01218

12-08-2020

IN RE: Mari Tara BARTHOLOMEW


Joint petition for consent discipline accepted. See per curiam.

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING

PER CURIAM

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel ("ODC") commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent mismanaged her client trust account. Following the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline, in which respondent admitted that her conduct violated Rules 1.5(f)(4), 1.15(a), 1.15(b), 1.15(f), and 8.4(a) of the Rules of Professional Conduct. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Mari Tara Bartholomew, Louisiana Bar Roll number 34242, be suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year and one day. All but thirty days of this suspension shall be deferred, followed by a two-year period of probation governed by the conditions set forth in the petition for consent discipline. The probationary period shall commence from the date respondent and the ODC execute a formal probation plan. Any failure of respondent to comply with the conditions of probation, or any misconduct during the probationary period, may be grounds for making the deferred portion of the suspension executory, or imposing additional discipline, as appropriate.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court's judgment until paid.


Summaries of

In re Bartholomew

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
Dec 8, 2020
305 So. 3d 848 (La. 2020)
Case details for

In re Bartholomew

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: MARI TARA BARTHOLOMEW

Court:SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Dec 8, 2020

Citations

305 So. 3d 848 (La. 2020)