In re Barker

Full title: IN RE WAYNE ERNEST BARKER

Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, Tenth District, Waco

Date published: Mar 10, 2010

No. 10-10-00085-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 10, 2010)

Opinion

No. 10-10-00085-CV

Opinion delivered and filed March 10, 2010.

Original Proceeding.

Petition denied.

Before Chief Justice GRAY, Justice REYNA, and Justice DAVIS.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

TOM GRAY, Chief Justice.

Wayne Ernest Barker, an inmate, filed a petition for writ of mandamus. There are procedural problems with the petition, but we use Rule 2 to look beyond those problems and deny the petition. See TEX. R. APP. P. 2.

Further, absent a specific exemption, the Clerk of the Court must collect filing fees at the time a document is presented for filing. TEX. R. APP. P. 12.1(b); Appendix to TEX. R. APP. P., Order Regarding Fees (Amended Aug. 28, 2007, eff. Sept. 1, 2007). See also TEX. R. APP. P. 5; 10TH TEX. APP. (WACO) LOC. R. 5; TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 51.207(b); § 51.941(a) (Vernon 2005); and § 51.208 (Vernon Supp. 2009). Under these circumstances, we suspend the rule and order the Clerk to write off all unpaid filing fees in this case. TEX. R. APP. P. 2. The write-off of the fees from the accounts receivable of the Court in no way eliminates or reduces the fees owed by Barker.