From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Azareon Y.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Apr 2, 2013
64 A.3d 119 (Conn. 2013)

Opinion

2013-04-2

In re AZAREON Y. et al.

James P. Sexton, Cheshire, in support of the petition. Susan T. Pearlman, assistant attorney general, in opposition.


James P. Sexton, Cheshire, in support of the petition. Susan T. Pearlman, assistant attorney general, in opposition.

The petition by the respondent mother for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 139 Conn.App. 457, 60 A.3d 742 (2012), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the respondent's unpreserved claim that General Statutes § 17a–112, as applied to her, violated her substantive due process rights was unreviewable because the record was inadequate for such review?

“2. If the answer to the first question is ‘no,’ then did General Statutes § 17a–112, as applied to the respondent in this case, violate her substantive due process rights?”

ESPINOSA, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.


Summaries of

In re Azareon Y.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Apr 2, 2013
64 A.3d 119 (Conn. 2013)
Case details for

In re Azareon Y.

Case Details

Full title:In re AZAREON Y. et al.

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Apr 2, 2013

Citations

64 A.3d 119 (Conn. 2013)
308 Conn. 928

Citing Cases

In re Brayden E.-H.

The petitioner filed a “preliminary statement of issues” challenging whether the respondent properly had…

In re Azareon Y.

We granted the respondent's petition for certification to appeal to this court to consider: (1) whether the…