From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Atwater

California Supreme Court (Minute Order)
Oct 31, 2019
No. S256596 (Cal. Oct. 31, 2019)

Opinion

S256596

10-31-2019

ATWATER III ON DISCIPLINE


Recommended discipline imposed

The court orders that BRUCE HALL ATWATER III (Respondent), State Bar Number 199011, is suspended from the practice of law in California for three years, execution of that period of suspension is stayed, and Respondent is placed on probation for three years subject to the following conditions:

1. Respondent is suspended from the practice of law for a minimum of the first two years of probation (with credit given for the period of inactive enrollment effective September 26, 2016 through April 22, 2019 (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 6233)), and Respondent will remain suspended until Respondent provides proof to the State Bar Court of rehabilitation, fitness to practice and present learning and ability in the general law. (Rules Proc. of State Bar, tit. IV, Stds. for Atty. Sanctions for Prof. Misconduct, std. 1.2(c)(1).)

2. Respondent must also comply with the other conditions of probation recommended by the Hearing Department of the State Bar Court in its Decision filed on April 23, 2019.

3. At the expiration of the period of probation, if Respondent has complied with all conditions of probation, the period of stayed suspension will be satisfied and that suspension will be terminated.

Respondent must provide to the State Bar's Office of Probation proof of taking and passing the Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination as recommended by the Hearing Department in its Decision filed on April 23, 2019. Failure to do so may result in suspension. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 9.10(b).)

Respondent must also comply with California Rules of Court, rule 9.20, and perform the acts specified in subdivisions (a) and (c) of that rule within 30 and 40 calendar days, respectively, after the effective date of this order. Failure to do so may result in disbarment or suspension.

Respondent must also maintain the records of compliance as required by the conditions of probation.

Costs are awarded to the State Bar in accordance with Business and Professions Code section 6086.10 and are enforceable both as provided in Business and Professions Code section 6140.7 and as a money judgment.


Summaries of

In re Atwater

California Supreme Court (Minute Order)
Oct 31, 2019
No. S256596 (Cal. Oct. 31, 2019)
Case details for

In re Atwater

Case Details

Full title:ATWATER III ON DISCIPLINE

Court:California Supreme Court (Minute Order)

Date published: Oct 31, 2019

Citations

No. S256596 (Cal. Oct. 31, 2019)