From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a.

Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 2, 2023
221 A.D.3d 1131 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)

Opinion

PM-252-23

11-02-2023

In the MATTER OF ATTORNEYS IN VIOLATION OF JUDICIARY LAW § 468–A. Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Petitioner; v. Edward Marc Sossner, Respondent. (Attorney Registration No. 2560266)

Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany (Alison M. Coan of counsel), for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department. LaMarche Safranko Law, PLLC, Albany (Andrew R. Safranko of counsel), for respondent.


Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany (Alison M. Coan of counsel), for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.

LaMarche Safranko Law, PLLC, Albany (Andrew R. Safranko of counsel), for respondent.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON MOTION

Respondent moves for his reinstatement to the practice of law following his suspension by September 2022 order of this Court ( Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468–a, 208 A.D.3d 1421, 1442, 173 N.Y.S.3d 697 [3d Dept. 2022] ; see Rules for Atty Disciplinary Matters [ 22 NYCRR] § 1240.16 ; Rules of App.Div., 3d Dept [ 22 NYCRR] § 806.16 ). The Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department (hereinafter AGC) opposes the motion and respondent has been heard in reply.

Upon reading respondent's motion papers, supplemental filing of September 11, 2023 and the responsive correspondence by AGC dated August 31, 2023, we find that respondent has satisfactorily met the requirements for reinstatement (see Rules for Atty Disciplinary Matters [ 22 NYCRR] § 1240.16 [a]); Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468–a [Stone], 195 A.D.3d 1226, 1227–1228, 145 N.Y.S.3d 428 [3d Dept. 2021] ). Accordingly, we grant respondent's motion for reinstatement.

The Court declines to weigh in on the allegations made within AGC's opposition papers in the context of this application.

ORDERED that respondent's motion for reinstatement is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law, effective immediately.

Clark, J.P., Aarons, Pritzker, Reynolds Fitzgerald and McShan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a.

Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 2, 2023
221 A.D.3d 1131 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)
Case details for

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Attorney…

Court:Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 2, 2023

Citations

221 A.D.3d 1131 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)
2023 N.Y. Slip Op. 5576
197 N.Y.S.3d 622