From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a.

Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 5, 2023
220 A.D.3d 1010 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)

Opinion

No. PM-235-23 Attorney Registration No. 3897618

10-05-2023

In the Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Petitioner; Youn Joon Han, Respondent.

Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany (Alison M. Coan of counsel), for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department. Tesser, Ryan & Rochman, LLP, White Plains (Randall Tesser of counsel), for respondent.


Calendar Date: September 18, 2023

Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany (Alison M. Coan of counsel), for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.

Tesser, Ryan & Rochman, LLP, White Plains (Randall Tesser of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Lynch, J.P., Clark, Pritzker, McShan and Powers, JJ., concur.

Motion by respondent for an order reinstating him to the practice of law following his suspension by September 2022 order of this Court (Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a , 208 A.D.3d 1421, 1431 [3d Dept 2022]; see Rules for Atty Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.16; Rules of App Div, 3d Dept [22 NYCRR] § 806.16).

Upon reading respondent's notice of motion and affidavit with exhibits and affirmation of counsel with exhibits filed August 14, 2023 and the September 13, 2023 responsive correspondence from the Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, and having determined, by clear and convincing evidence, that (1) respondent has complied with the order of suspension and the rules of this Court, (2) respondent has the requisite character and fitness to practice law, and (3) it would be in the public interest to reinstate respondent to the practice of law (see Rules for Atty Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.16 [a]), it is

ORDERED that respondent's motion for reinstatement is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law, effective immediately.

Lynch, J.P., Clark, Pritzker, McShan and Powers, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a.

Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 5, 2023
220 A.D.3d 1010 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)
Case details for

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Attorney…

Court:Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Oct 5, 2023

Citations

220 A.D.3d 1010 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)
2023 N.Y. Slip Op. 5025
195 N.Y.S.3d 826