From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-A

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Aug 29, 2019
175 A.D.3d 838 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

PM-127-19

08-29-2019

In the MATTER OF ATTORNEYS IN VIOLATION OF JUDICIARY LAW § 468-A. Sarah Lena Andrews, Respondent. (Attorney Registration No. 4446357)

Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department. Sarah Lena Andrews, Bondi, Australia, respondent pro se.


Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.

Sarah Lena Andrews, Bondi, Australia, respondent pro se.

DECISION AND ORDER ON MOTION

Motion by respondent for an order reinstating her to the practice of law following her suspension by May 2019 order of this Court ( Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a , 172 A.D.3d 1706, 1709, 104 N.Y.S.3d 211 [2019] ; see Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [ 22 NYCRR] § 1240.16 ; Rules of App Div, 3d Dept [ 22 NYCRR] § 806.16 ).

Upon reading respondent's notice of motion and affidavit with exhibits sworn to July 8, 2019, and upon reading the August 8, 2019 correspondence from the Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department in response, and having determined, by clear and convincing evidence, that (1) respondent has complied with the order of suspension and the Rules of this Court, (2) respondent has the requisite character and fitness to practice law, and (3) it would be in the public interest to reinstate respondent to the practice of law (see Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Zerdan] , 173 A.D.3d 1602, 1603, 101 N.Y.S.3d 656 [2019] ; Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Serbinowski] , 164 A.D.3d 1049, 1050, 85 N.Y.S.3d 232 [2018] ), it is

ORDERED that respondent's motion for reinstatement is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law, effectively immediately.

Egan Jr., J.P., Lynch, Mulvey, Aarons and Rumsey, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-A

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Aug 29, 2019
175 A.D.3d 838 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-A

Case Details

Full title:In the MATTER OF ATTORNEYS IN VIOLATION OF JUDICIARY LAW § 468-A. Sarah…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Aug 29, 2019

Citations

175 A.D.3d 838 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
105 N.Y.S.3d 707