From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law & 468-a.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department
Apr 14, 2022
No. 2022-02483 (N.Y. App. Div. Apr. 14, 2022)

Opinion

2022-02483 Attorney Registration 4832556

04-14-2022

In the Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Petitioner; Lee Jiun Lok, Respondent.

Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department. LaMarche Safranko LLP, Cohoes (Nicholas J. Evanovich III of counsel), for respondent.


Calendar Date: April 4, 2022

Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.

LaMarche Safranko LLP, Cohoes (Nicholas J. Evanovich III of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Egan Jr., J.P., Lynch, Aarons, Colangelo and Fisher, JJ.

Motion by respondent for an order reinstating her to the practice of law following her suspension by October 2021 order of this Court (Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a , 198 A.D.3d 1068, 1080 [2021]; see Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.16; Rules of App Div, 3d Dept [22 NYCRR] § 806.16).

Upon reading respondent's notice of motion and affidavit with exhibits sworn to February 21, 2022, and the March 21, 2022 responsive correspondence from the Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, and having determined, by clear and convincing evidence, that (1) respondent has complied with the order of suspension and the Rules of this Court, (2) respondent has the requisite character and fitness to practice law, and (3) it would be in the public interest to reinstate respondent to the practice of law (see Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Nenninger], 180 A.D.3d 1317, 1317-1318 [2020]), it is

ORDERED that respondent's motion for reinstatement is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law, effectively immediately.

Egan Jr., J.P., Lynch, Aarons, Colangelo and Fisher, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law & 468-a.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department
Apr 14, 2022
No. 2022-02483 (N.Y. App. Div. Apr. 14, 2022)
Case details for

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law & 468-a.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Attorney…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department

Date published: Apr 14, 2022

Citations

No. 2022-02483 (N.Y. App. Div. Apr. 14, 2022)