From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-A

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Jan 23, 2020
179 A.D.3d 1380 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)

Opinion

PM-21-20

01-23-2020

In the MATTER OF ATTORNEYS IN VIOLATION OF JUDICIARY LAW § 468-A. Steven Charles Gove, Respondent. (Attorney Registration No. 4135000)

Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department. Steven Charles Gove, Los Angeles, California, respondent pro se.


Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.

Steven Charles Gove, Los Angeles, California, respondent pro se.

DECISION AND ORDER ON MOTION

Motion by respondent for an order reinstating him to the practice of law following his suspension by May 2019 order of this Court ( Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a , 172 A.D.3d 1706, 104 N.Y.S.3d 211 [2019] ; see Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [ 22 NYCRR] § 1240.16 ; Rules of App Div, 3d Dept [ 22 NYCRR] § 806.16 ).

Upon reading respondent's notice of motion, affidavit with exhibit sworn to November 4, 2019, supplemental affidavit with exhibits sworn to January 2, 2020, and the correspondence from the Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department dated December 23, 2019, and having determined, by clear and convincing evidence, that (1) respondent has complied with the order of suspension and the Rules of this Court, (2) respondent has the requisite character and fitness to practice law, and (3) it would be in the public interest to reinstate respondent to the practice of law (see Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Stonner] , 175 A.D.3d 799, 103 N.Y.S.3d 881 [2019] ; Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Dorsett] , 174 A.D.3d 1219, 102 N.Y.S.3d 897 [2019] ), it is

ORDERED that respondent's motion for reinstatement is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law, effectively immediately.

Garry, P.J., Lynch, Mulvey, Aarons and Reynolds Fitzgerald, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-A

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Jan 23, 2020
179 A.D.3d 1380 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
Case details for

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-A

Case Details

Full title:In the MATTER OF ATTORNEYS IN VIOLATION OF JUDICIARY LAW § 468-A. Steven…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Jan 23, 2020

Citations

179 A.D.3d 1380 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
114 N.Y.S.3d 733