From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 30, 2005
19 A.D.3d 996 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

June 30, 2005.

Per Curiam. Respondent, who was admitted to practice by this Court in 1987, was suspended by this Court's order dated June 15, 2000 for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a ( 273 AD2d 600).

Mark S. Ochs, Committee on Professional Standards, Albany, for petitioner.

Caroline Kahn, Washington, D.C., respondent pro se.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Crew III, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur.


Respondent now requests reinstatement on the ground that she has complied with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and the Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts ( see 22 NYCRR part 118). Petitioner does not object to respondent's application.

Respondent's application is granted and she is ordered reinstated, effective immediately.

Ordered that respondent's application is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.


Summaries of

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 30, 2005
19 A.D.3d 996 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ATTORNEYS IN VIOLATION OF JUDICIARY LAW § 468-A…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 30, 2005

Citations

19 A.D.3d 996 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
797 N.Y.S.2d 321