In re Attorneys in Vio. of Jud. Law § 468-a

Full title: In the Matter of ATTORNEYS IN VIOLATION OF JUDICIARY LAW § 468-a…

Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jul 17, 2002

296 A.D.2d 712 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

745 N.Y.S.2d 496

Opinion

468-A

July 17, 2002.

Respondent, who was admitted to practice by this court in 1991, was suspended by this court's order dated November 20, 1998, for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of section 468-a of the Judiciary Law ( 255 A.D.2d 827).

Mark S. Ochs, Committee on Professional Standards, Albany, for petitioner.

David J. Orticelli, Easton, Connecticut, respondent pro se.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Crew III, Peters and Spain, JJ.

Per Curiam.

Respondent has now complied with the registration requirements of § 468-a of the Judiciary Law and has paid the fees as required by the statute and Rules of the Chief Administrator. Petitioner Committee on Professional Standards does not object to respondent's instant application for reinstatement.

Respondent's application is granted and he is ordered reinstated, effective immediately.

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Crew III, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that respondent's application is granted, and it is further

ORDERED that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.