From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Attorneys

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Aug 5, 2010
76 A.D.3d 744 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

August 5, 2010.

Petitioner moves to suspend respondent attorneys on the ground that they have failed to file a registration statement and pay the required attorney registration fee in accordance with Judiciary Law § 468-a (2) and part 118 of the Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts ( see 22 NYCRR 118.1 [c]).

Mark S. Ochs, Committee on Professional Standards, Albany, for petitioner.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Peters, Spain and Rose, JJ.


The moving papers indicate that despite written notices sent to them by the Office of Court Administration at their last known address, respondents have failed to register and pay the required fee. They have also failed to respond to the instant motion.

Judiciary Law § 468-a (5) provides that noncompliance with the statute and rules regarding attorney registration "shall constitute conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice and shall be referred to the appropriate appellate division . . . for disciplinary action." This Court has previously held that failure to comply with the registration requirements is professional misconduct warranting discipline ( see e.g. Matter of Arms, 251 AD2d 743; Matter of Ryan, 238 AD2d 713; Matter of Farley, 205 AD2d 874).

In view of respondents' continued failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of the Judiciary Law and Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts, petitioner's motion is granted and the respondents listed on the schedule attached hereto are suspended, effective 30 days from the date of this order, until further order of this Court ( see Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a , 65 AD3d 1447).

Ordered that petitioner's motion is granted; and it is further ordered that the respondents listed on the schedule attached hereto are suspended, effective 30 days from the date of this order, until further order of this Court; and it is further ordered that, for the period of suspension, respondents are commanded to desist and refrain from the practice of law in any form either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another; and respondents are hereby forbidden to appear as attorneys or counselors-at-law before any court, judge, justice, board, commission or other public authority or to give to another any opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto; and it is further ordered that respondents shall comply with the provisions of this Court's rules regulating the conduct of suspended attorneys ( see 22 NYCRR 806.9).

Last Name First Name Middle Name Reg # Year Adm Dept Barrantes Rachael Wendeen 4124343 2003 3 Bradbrooke Timothy Dane 2709111 1995 1 Brown Judith Helen 2598415 1994 3 Junco Judith Lynn 2947141 1999 3 Peclard Oliver Jacques 2170058 1987 3 Uyamadu John Chukwunwe 4343307 2005 3


Summaries of

In re Attorneys

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Aug 5, 2010
76 A.D.3d 744 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

In re Attorneys

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ATTORNEYS IN VIOLATION OF JUDICIARY LAW § 468-A…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Aug 5, 2010

Citations

76 A.D.3d 744 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 6347
905 N.Y.S.2d 919

Citing Cases

In re Merino

He presently lists a business address in Washington, DC with the Office of Court Administration. By August…

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-A

He presently lists a business address in Washington, DC with the Office of Court Administration.By August…