From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Aredia & Zometa Prods. Liab. Litig.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Dec 7, 2012
NO. 3-06-MD-1760 (M.D. Tenn. Dec. 7, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 3-06-MD-1760

12-07-2012

In re: AREDIA and ZOMETA PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION This Document Relates To Case Number: 03-07-1071(Avila)


JUDGE CAMPBELL


ORDER

Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 6265). Plaintiff has subsequently filed a Reply to Defendant's Response to Motion for Remand.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) and Local Rule 72.03(b)(3), the Court has reviewed de novo the Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff's Reply, and the file. The Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 6265) is adopted and approved. Plaintiff's Motion for Remand (Docket No. 6227) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________

TODD J. CAMPBELL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

In re Aredia & Zometa Prods. Liab. Litig.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Dec 7, 2012
NO. 3-06-MD-1760 (M.D. Tenn. Dec. 7, 2012)
Case details for

In re Aredia & Zometa Prods. Liab. Litig.

Case Details

Full title:In re: AREDIA and ZOMETA PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION This Document…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Dec 7, 2012

Citations

NO. 3-06-MD-1760 (M.D. Tenn. Dec. 7, 2012)