From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re A.P.S.L

Florida Court of Appeals, Second District
Jun 16, 2021
No. 2D20-2782 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Jun. 16, 2021)

Opinion

2D20-2782

06-16-2021

In the Interest of A.P.S.L, a child. v. ADRIENNE MICHELLE KILPATRICK, Appellee. MARK STEPHEN LEFCOURT, Appellant,

Mark Stephen Lefcourt, pro se. Adrienne Michelle Kilpatrick, pro se.


Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130 from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Jared E. Smith, Judge.

Mark Stephen Lefcourt, pro se.

Adrienne Michelle Kilpatrick, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Dismissed as moot. See Troike v. Troike, 271 So.3d 1069, 1072-73 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019) (holding that the previous order modifying "timesharing without appropriate due process" was moot after the trial court issued a subsequent order "that reinstated some unsupervised timesharing"); see also Stover v. Stover, 287 So.3d 1277, 1278-79 (Fla. 2d DCA 2020) (holding that the timesharing issue was moot because the temporary injunction expired and the timesharing award was no longer in effect).

LaROSE, SLEET, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.


Summaries of

In re A.P.S.L

Florida Court of Appeals, Second District
Jun 16, 2021
No. 2D20-2782 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Jun. 16, 2021)
Case details for

In re A.P.S.L

Case Details

Full title:In the Interest of A.P.S.L, a child. v. ADRIENNE MICHELLE KILPATRICK…

Court:Florida Court of Appeals, Second District

Date published: Jun 16, 2021

Citations

No. 2D20-2782 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Jun. 16, 2021)