From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Appln. of Gherardi v. City of N.Y

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 2, 2002
294 A.D.2d 101 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

911N

May 2, 2002.

Judgment (denominated order), Supreme Court, Bronx County (Stanley Green, J.), entered May 10, 2001, which denied petitioners' application for leave to serve a late notice of claim upon respondents, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the petition granted, and such notice deemed timely served nunc pro tunc.

ALEXANDER J. WULWICK, for petitioners-appellants.

GEORGE GUTWIRTH, for respondents-respondents.

Before: Williams, P.J., Tom, Mazzarelli, Andrias, Friedman, JJ.


The petition for leave to serve a late notice of claim on respondents should have been granted. Petitioners made an excusable error concerning the identity of the public corporation against which the claim should be asserted and acted within reasonable time to correct the error, respondents acquired actual knowledge of the claim within a reasonable time after expiration of the 90-day period for service of the notice, and respondents were not substantially prejudiced by the delay (see, General Municipal Law § 50-e).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

In re Appln. of Gherardi v. City of N.Y

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 2, 2002
294 A.D.2d 101 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

In re Appln. of Gherardi v. City of N.Y

Case Details

Full title:IN RE APPLICATION OF ROBERT GHERARDI, ET AL., PETITIONERS-APPELLANTS, v…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 2, 2002

Citations

294 A.D.2d 101 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
740 N.Y.S.2d 865

Citing Cases

Mouzalas v. City of New York

Moreover, GML § 50-e(5) provides that "[i]n determining whether to grant the extension, the court shall…

In re Garcia v. New York City Hous. Auth.

As law office failure, including clerical errors and "mere inadvertence," does not constitute a reasonable…