Opinion
No. 13343
Opinion Filed November 28, 1922. Rehearing Denied January 16, 1923.
(Syllabus.)
Corporation Commission — Appeals from Orders — Procedure.]
Under and by virtue of section 9, art. 20, of the Constitution, and section 5, ch. 93. Session Laws 1913, appeals from the Corporation Commission are taken in the manner in which appeals are taken to the Supreme Court from the district court, and must be by petition in error filed in this court, setting forth the error complained of.
Appeal from Order of Corporation Commission.
In the matter of application of the Quintion Relief Oil Gas Company for modification of Order No. 1667, prohibiting the burning of natural gas in the Quinton Oil Field for the purpose of manufacturing carbon black. Appeal dismissed.
Guy A. Curry (Rainey Flynn, on brief), for appellant.
Ames, Chambers, Lowe Richardson, for appellee.
The Quinton Relief Oil Gas Company instituted this proceeding to review an order of the Corporation Commission made on the 27th day of January, 1922, wherein the Corporation Commission revoked and set aside without notice a former order of the commission made on May 14, 1921. The only record filed in this case is an application of the Quinton Relief Oil Gas Company for a supersedeas, which was filed May 10, 1922. No petition in error has ever been filed in this court. Section 20, art. 9, of the Constitution provides for appeal of transportation and transmission companies from orders of the Corporation Commission, and provides that said appeals may be taken in the manner in which appeals may be taken to the Supreme Court from the district court. Section 5, ch. 93, Session Laws 1913, page 152, provides that appeals from orders of the commission may be had in the same manner as appeals from said commission by transportation or transmission companies. Section 5238, Rev. Laws 1910, as, amended by chapter 219, Session Laws 1913, page 403, provides that a proceeding to reverse, vacate, or modify any order shall be by petition filed in the Supreme Court.
Under and by virtue of the above sections of the Constitution and statutes, the failure to file a petition in error is jurisdictional, and this court is without jurisdiction to review any errors complained of in the absence of a petition in error.
KANE, JOHNSON, MILLER, KENNAMER, and NICHOLSON, JJ., concur.