From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Hung Yuk Ong

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 7, 2002
299 A.D.2d 173 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2149N

November 7, 2002.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Rosalyn Richter, J.), entered on or about February 11, 2002, which denied petitioner's request to withdraw the petition, but stayed the dissolution proceeding pending an appraisal of petitioner's shares pursuant to Business Corporation Law § 1118, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

PHILIP A. GREENBERG, for petitioner-appellant.

LYNN ARMENTROUT, for respondents-respondents.

Before: Tom, J.P., Rosenberger, Friedman, Gonzalez, JJ.


In this proceeding brought pursuant to Business Corporation Law §§ 1104 and 1104-a, the court properly denied petitioner permission to withdraw her petition, which she clearly sought in response to respondents' exercise of their statutory buy-out option under Business Corporation Law § 1118 (see Matter of Musilli, 134 A.D.2d 15) . Contrary to petitioner's argument, Fedele v. Seybert ( 250 A.D.2d 519) provides no support for her position, since the pleading in that case sought common-law, rather than statutory, dissolution, and thus implicated no statutory buy-out right.

We have considered petitioner's other contentions and find them unavailing.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

In re Hung Yuk Ong

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 7, 2002
299 A.D.2d 173 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

In re Hung Yuk Ong

Case Details

Full title:IN RE APPLICATION OF HUNG YUK ONG, ETC., PETITIONER-APPELLANT, FOR THE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 7, 2002

Citations

299 A.D.2d 173 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
753 N.Y.S.2d 360

Citing Cases

Maroney v. Hawkins

The primary relief sought in the New York County action was judicial dissolution.However, judicial…

In the Matter of Astoria Sports Complex, Inc.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court properly exercised its discretion in granting the…