From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Doe

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jul 31, 2002
772 N.E.2d 639 (Ohio 2002)

Opinion

No. 2002-0494.

Submitted May 22, 2002.

Decided July 31, 2002.

John Doe II, pro se.

Robert E. Sweeney Co., L.P.A., and John L. Goodman, for Joint Admissions Committee of the Cleveland/Cuyahoga County Bar Association.


{¶ 1} The Board of Commissioners on Character and Fitness of the Supreme Court has recommended that the applicant, John Doe II, not be approved for admission to the practice of law in Ohio based on his current application, but that he be permitted to reapply to take the July 2002 bar exam and that he be required to submit medical evidence substantiating his sustained psychological well-being. We agree that Doe's application should be denied now, but we require a longer waiting period to allow us to evaluate his ability to maintain the medication regimen and health necessary for the regulation of his bipolar disorder. Accordingly, we deny Doe's application for admission to the bar and grant him permission to reapply for the bar exam in February 2003. We further order that the record of proceedings in this case be sealed.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.

Resnick and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur in part and dissent in part.


{¶ 2} I agree with the majority that the applicant should be permitted to reapply for the February 2003 bar examination. However, I disagree with the majority's decision to order that the record of proceedings in this case be sealed, since all matters of this nature should be open to the public.

Lundberg Stratton, J., concurs in the foregoing opinion.


Summaries of

In re Doe

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jul 31, 2002
772 N.E.2d 639 (Ohio 2002)
Case details for

In re Doe

Case Details

Full title:In re Application of John Doe II

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Jul 31, 2002

Citations

772 N.E.2d 639 (Ohio 2002)
772 N.E.2d 639