From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re A.P.

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Aug 21, 2019
No. 05-19-00911-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 21, 2019)

Opinion

No. 05-19-00911-CV

08-21-2019

IN RE A.P. AND D. P., INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIENDS FOR K.D.P., A MINOR, Relators


Original Proceeding from the 422nd Judicial District Court Kaufman County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 102717-CC

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Myers, Molberg, and Nowell
Opinion by Justice Myers

Before the Court is relators' petition for writ of mandamus seeking to have our Court vacate the trial court's July 24, 2019 temporary orders and compel the trial court to return their child, K.D.P., to their custody. To be entitled to mandamus relief, relators must show that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that relators have no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). After reviewing the petition and mandamus record, we conclude relators have not shown they are entitled to the relief requested.

Accordingly, we deny relators' petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a) (the court must deny the petition if the court determines relator is not entitled to the relief sought).

/Lana Myers/

LANA MYERS

JUSTICE 190911F.P05


Summaries of

In re A.P.

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Aug 21, 2019
No. 05-19-00911-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 21, 2019)
Case details for

In re A.P.

Case Details

Full title:IN RE A.P. AND D. P., INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIENDS FOR K.D.P., A…

Court:Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Date published: Aug 21, 2019

Citations

No. 05-19-00911-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 21, 2019)