From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Andrews v. Riggs Nat'l Bank, Wash., D.C

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jul 23, 1996
90 F.3d 102 (4th Cir. 1996)

Opinion

No. 93-2095.

Filed July 23, 1996.


ORDER

Upon a request for a poll of the court on the petition for rehearing en banc, voting for rehearing en banc were Judges Russell, Widener and Hall, and voting against rehearing en banc were Judges Wilkinson, Murnaghan, Wilkins, Niemeyer, Hamilton, Luttig, Williams, Michael and Motz. Judge Ervin did not participate in this decision.

It is accordingly ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the petition for rehearing en banc shall be, and it hereby is, denied.

The panel considered the petition for rehearing and is of opinion it is without merit.

It is accordingly ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the petition for rehearing shall be, and it hereby is denied.

Judges Wilkins and Ellis concur in this order. Judge Widener dissents. He would grant rehearing for the reasons expressed in his dissenting opinion.

/s/ H. E. Widener, Jr., For the Court


Summaries of

In re Andrews v. Riggs Nat'l Bank, Wash., D.C

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jul 23, 1996
90 F.3d 102 (4th Cir. 1996)
Case details for

In re Andrews v. Riggs Nat'l Bank, Wash., D.C

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: JOHN A. ANDREWS, DEBTOR. JOHN A. ANDREWS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jul 23, 1996

Citations

90 F.3d 102 (4th Cir. 1996)

Citing Cases

Dawsey v. Kirven

So, if the power of attorney and all acts of the agent or attorney purporting to be done thereunder were…

Ex Parte Stroud

The domicile of a married man is presumed to be at the place where his wife and family reside and where the…