From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Anderson Williams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 3, 2011
81 A.D.3d 1021 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

No. 510124.

February 3, 2011.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review four determinations of respondent Superintendent of Altona Correctional Facility which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Anderson Williams, New York City, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Frank Brady of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Peters, J.P., Lahtinen, Malone Jr., Stein and Egan Jr., JJ.


Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging four separate tier II disciplinary determinations. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determinations at issue have been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the $5 mandatory surcharges have been returned to his inmate account. Petitioner is not entitled to be restored to the status he enjoyed prior to the disciplinary determinations and has received all the relief to which he is entitled ( see Matter of Britt v Fischer, 76 AD3d 735; Matter of Bornstorff v Fischer, 67 AD3d 1138). Therefore, the petition is dismissed as moot.

Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.


Summaries of

In re Anderson Williams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 3, 2011
81 A.D.3d 1021 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

In re Anderson Williams

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ANDERSON WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. BRIAN FISCHER, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Feb 3, 2011

Citations

81 A.D.3d 1021 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 601
916 N.Y.S.2d 853

Citing Cases

In re Hassan Abdul-Malik

The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all…