From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Allstate Vehicle & Prop. Ins. Co.

COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
Apr 8, 2019
NUMBER 13-19-00089-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 8, 2019)

Opinion

NUMBER 13-19-00089-CV

04-08-2019

IN RE ALLSTATE VEHICLE AND PROPERTY INSURANCE COMPANY


On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Hinojosa
Memorandum Opinion by Justice Hinojosa

See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) ("When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so. When granting relief, the court must hand down an opinion as in any other case."); see id. R. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).

Relator Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company (Allstate) filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause seeking to compel the trial court to strike the petitions for intervention filed by real parties in interest Rosa and Mario Garza, Natzelly and Jose Villarreal, Cesar Zamora, Julia and Hector Miranda, Miguel Salazar and Alma Martinez, and Erasmo and Irasema Gonzalez. This Court granted a stay of the underlying proceedings and requested that the real parties in interest file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus. Allstate has now filed a motion to withdraw its petition for writ of mandamus on grounds that the parties have finalized an agreement resolving the issues raised in this original proceeding.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus, the record, and the additional filings provided by the parties to this original proceeding, is of the opinion that this matter has been rendered moot. See City of Krum, Tex. v. Rice, 543 S.W.3d 747, 749 (Tex. 2017) (per curiam) (stating that a case is moot when either no live controversy exists between the parties or the parties have no legally cognizable interest in the outcome); Heckman v. Williamson Cty., 369 S.W.3d 137, 162 (Tex. 2012) ("Put simply, a case is moot when the court's action on the merits cannot affect the parties' rights or interests."); In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 166 S.W.3d 732, 737 (Tex. 2005) (orig. proceeding) ("A case becomes moot if a controversy ceases to exist between the parties at any stage of the legal proceedings, including the appeal."). Accordingly, we lift the stay previously imposed in this case, grant Allstate's motion to withdraw this original proceeding, and dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

LETICIA HINOJOSA

Justice Delivered and filed the 8th day of April, 2019.


Summaries of

In re Allstate Vehicle & Prop. Ins. Co.

COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
Apr 8, 2019
NUMBER 13-19-00089-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 8, 2019)
Case details for

In re Allstate Vehicle & Prop. Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:IN RE ALLSTATE VEHICLE AND PROPERTY INSURANCE COMPANY

Court:COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

Date published: Apr 8, 2019

Citations

NUMBER 13-19-00089-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 8, 2019)