From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Alexander

State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Apr 18, 2019
NO. 14-18-00466-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 18, 2019)

Opinion

NO. 14-18-00466-CV

04-18-2019

IN RE EDWARD ALEXANDER, ADAM JOHNSON, WAYNE THOMPSON, JR., LILYNN CUTRER, AND KAREN AUCOIN, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS CO-TRUSTEES, Relators


ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS
Probate Court No. 4 Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause Nos. 365053 & 365053-404

CONTINUING ABATEMENT ORDER

On June 7, 2018, relators Edward Alexander, Adam Johnson, Wayne Thompson, Jr., Lilynn Cutrer, and Karen Aucoin, Individually and as Co-Trustees, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. In the petition, relators ask this court to order the Honorable Christine Butts, Judge of the Probate Court No. 4, in Harris County, Texas, to set aside her June 5, 2018 order granting the motion to compel filed by real party in interest Preston Marshall.

On August 30, 2018, we abated this case because the 14th Judicial District Court of Calcasieu Parish, Louisiana, entered a preliminary injunction, which stated in relevant part:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the preliminary injunction sought herein be and is hereby GRANTED, enjoining and prohibiting Preston Marshall, and all persons in active concert or participation with him, from filing, proceeding with or participating in any litigation or proceeding related to the administration of the Harrier Trust outside of this Court, including but not limited to the appointment of the co-trustees, compensation of the co-trustees, distributions from the accumulations of the Trust, and powers, rights, responsibilities, and fiduciary duties of the co-trustees under the Trust.

Preston Marshall advised this court that the Louisiana Third Circuit Court of Appeals vacated the preliminary injunction.

We continued the abatement of this case when Judge Butts ceased to hold office of Judge of Probate Court No. 4, Harris County, Texas, to permit her successor, the Honorable James Horwitz, to reconsider the decision regarding relators' request for relief. See Tex. R. App. P. 7.2(b); see also In re Baylor Med. Ctr. at Garland, 280 S.W.3d 227, 228 (Tex. 2008) (orig. proceeding) ("Mandamus will not issue against a new judge for what a former one did.").

Judge Horwitz advised this court by letter that he stands by Judge Butts's decision regarding relators' request for relief. However, Judge Horwitz did not provide this court with a signed order reflecting his ruling regarding relators' request for relief. Therefore. abatement of this case is continued until May 3, 2019, by which time Judge Horwitz shall file with this court a signed order reflecting his ruling concerning relators' request for relief. The Court will then consider a motion to reinstate or dismiss the original proceeding, as appropriate.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Wise, Jewell, and Bourliot.


Summaries of

In re Alexander

State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Apr 18, 2019
NO. 14-18-00466-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 18, 2019)
Case details for

In re Alexander

Case Details

Full title:IN RE EDWARD ALEXANDER, ADAM JOHNSON, WAYNE THOMPSON, JR., LILYNN CUTRER…

Court:State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals

Date published: Apr 18, 2019

Citations

NO. 14-18-00466-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 18, 2019)