From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Air Crash Disaster at Cincinnati Airport

Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
Oct 21, 1968
295 F. Supp. 51 (J.P.M.L. 1968)

Opinion

No. 8A.

October 21, 1968.

Before ALFRED P. MURRAH, Chairman, JOHN MINOR WISDOM, EDWARD WEINFELD, EDWIN A. ROBSON, WILLIAM H. BECKER, JOSEPH S. LORD, III, and STANLEY A. WEIGEL, Judges of the Panel.


OPINION AND ORDER


This matter came up for consideration on August 8, 1968 pursuant to the Panel's order to show cause why the actions listed on the attached Schedule A should not be consolidated and transferred to a district or districts other than those in which they are now pending. This show cause order was entered on the initiative of the Panel pursuant to section 1407(c)(i).

On November 8, 1965, American Airlines Flight 383 crashed while making its final approach to the Greater Cincinnati Airport. Fifty-eight of the sixty-two persons on board were killed. There are thirteen civil actions arising from this accident presently pending in six different federal district courts.

One case, Creasy v. American Airlines, et al., was tried to jury in the Northern District of Texas. The jury found the airline alone negligent and awarded the plaintiff $175,000 in damages.

All counsel in the cases listed on Schedule A were notified of the hearing and none who appeared opposed consolidation and transfer. Counsel for certain of the passenger-plaintiffs objected to the inclusion of the "crew cases" and the actions commenced by the airlines against the United States with the "passenger cases" on the ground that the former present substantially different and more complex issues. Those actions may indeed present substantially different legal issues but many of the fact questions are common to all cases. Cf. In re Air Crash Disaster At Greater Cincinnati Airport (Constance, Kentucky) On November 20, 1967, 298 F. Supp. 353 (Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, 1968). Counsel in the passenger cases is concerned that consolidation of all cases may delay trial of the "passenger cases" but they may be separated and remanded pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407(a) as soon as pretrial is completed as to them.

Counsel appearing for all parties readily conceded that the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky is the most appropriate court to conduct the pretrial proceedings. The situs of the crash, many of the witnesses and much of the documentation is located within or convenient to the Eastern District of Kentucky. Chief Judge Mac Swinford is willing and able to accept the responsibility for supervising the pretrial of these cases. We are satisfied that the consolidation of all cases arising from the November 8, 1965 crash in the Eastern District of Kentucky will be for the convenience of parties and witnesses and will best promote the just and efficient conduct of these cases.

It is therefore ordered that the seven actions listed on the attached Schedule A pending in districts other than the Eastern District of Kentucky be and the same are hereby transferred on the initiative of the Panel under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the Eastern District of Kentucky and assigned to the Honorable Mac Swinford, Chief Judge of said district, with the consent in writing of the transferee court which has been filed with the Clerk of the Panel.

SCHEDULE A

Eastern District of Louisiana

Eastern District of Pennsylvania

1. Ketchel Civil Action v. No. 16608 Boeing Company
2. McDevitt Civil Action v. No. 40550 American Airlines
3. Curran Civil Action v. No. 66-167 American Airlines
4. Healy Civil Action v. No. 6287 American Airlines
5. Central Trust Company Civil Action v. No. 6295 American Airlines
6. Schneebeck Civil Action v. No. 11629 O'Neill and Teelin (Estates of pilot and co-pilot)
7. Ketchell Civil Action v. No. 1308 U.S.A. (Covington)


Summaries of

In re Air Crash Disaster at Cincinnati Airport

Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
Oct 21, 1968
295 F. Supp. 51 (J.P.M.L. 1968)
Case details for

In re Air Crash Disaster at Cincinnati Airport

Case Details

Full title:In re Multidistrict Civil Actions Involving the AIR CRASH DISASTER AT the…

Court:Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Date published: Oct 21, 1968

Citations

295 F. Supp. 51 (J.P.M.L. 1968)

Citing Cases

In re Westec Corporation

The existence of different questions of law does not preclude transfer under Section 1407. In re Cincinnati…

In re Mid-Air Collision Near Fairland, Indiana

We have consistently held that the district encompassing the situs of the crash is generally the most…