From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re "AGENT ORANGE" Product Liability Litigation

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Mar 2, 2005
MDL No. 381, No. 03-CV-2935 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 2, 2005)

Opinion

MDL No. 381, No. 03-CV-2935.

March 2, 2005


JUDGMENT


Upon consideration of all pleadings, motions and proceedings and the full record in MDL No. 381 and in the above-captioned action, for the reasons stated in Isaacson v. Dow Chem. Co., 344 F.Supp.2d 873 (E.D.N.Y. 2004), and prior opinions in MDL No. 381,

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED THAT:

1. Defendants Dow Chemical Company and Monsanto Company shall have judgment against Plaintiff Robert I. Skinner;

2. The action is dismissed on the merits; and

3. No costs or disbursements are awarded to any party against any other party.
SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

In re "AGENT ORANGE" Product Liability Litigation

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Mar 2, 2005
MDL No. 381, No. 03-CV-2935 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 2, 2005)
Case details for

In re "AGENT ORANGE" Product Liability Litigation

Case Details

Full title:In re: "AGENT ORANGE" PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION. ROBERT I. SKINNER…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. New York

Date published: Mar 2, 2005

Citations

MDL No. 381, No. 03-CV-2935 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 2, 2005)