From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Adoption of A.M.L

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jul 24, 1974
297 So. 2d 840 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

Opinion

No. 73-410.

July 24, 1974.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Lee County, James R. Adams, J.

Frank B. Watson, Jr. and T. Rankin Terry, Jr. of Roberts, Watson, Taylor McNeil, Fort Myers, for appellants.

Sheppard Johnson by Emmet B. Anderson, Fort Myers, for appellee.


This is an appeal from a brief order denying, without ascription of reason, the petition of foster parents to adopt a small child who has been in their care since she was two months old. The child's mother was married at the time of the birth and both the mother and her husband have consented to the adoption. A man who is said to be the natural father of the child contested the adoption. The record before us is scant, but reveals a report of the Division of Family Services which recommends the adoption and reports to the circuit court that the adopting parents are fit persons to adopt this child.

This is among those cases in which the easy way out for an appellate court is to affirm for failure of the appellant to bring an adequate record, but we are mindful of the paramount interest in the welfare of the child as well as the presumption of correctness which attends the trial judge's order. Recently, in Gregory v. Gregory, Fla.App.2d 1974, 289 So.2d 468, this court, speaking through Circuit Judge Alan R. Schwartz, declined to pursue the easy course. There we allowed the appellant an opportunity to perfect the record pursuant to Rule 3.6( l) F.A.R. We follow the same procedure here. If it is necessary to reconstruct the record, provision is made by Rule 3.6( l) F.A.R. of a means whereby the appellant may do so. See Travelers Insurance Co. v. Agricultural Delivery Service, Inc., Fla.App.2d 1972, 262 So.2d 210; Agricultural Delivery Service, Inc. v. Travelers Insurance Co., Fla.App.2d 1972, 269 So.2d 429.

In the interest of this child's welfare, we allow the appellant 30 days within which to furnish an adequate record. If the record of proceedings in the trial court must be reconstructed, additional time will be allowed upon motion addressed to the trial court.

Ordered accordingly.

GRIMES, J., and NANCE, L. CLAYTON, Associate Judge, concur.


Summaries of

In re Adoption of A.M.L

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jul 24, 1974
297 So. 2d 840 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)
Case details for

In re Adoption of A.M.L

Case Details

Full title:IN RE ADOPTION OF A.M.L., A MINOR

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jul 24, 1974

Citations

297 So. 2d 840 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

Citing Cases

Hill v. Hill

PER CURIAM. Petitioner seeks review of Hill v. Hill, 765 So.2d 99 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000), based on express and…

Miami Herald Pub. Co. v. Payne

Upon a review of the petition, the record on appeal, and briefs in this cause and being duly advised in the…