From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Adams

United States District Court, D. Montana
Feb 4, 1933
12 F. Supp. 755 (D. Mont. 1933)

Opinion

No. 4804.

February 4, 1933.

John W. Bonner and Thomas W. Bonner, both of Butte, Mont., for bankrupt.


It is more than twelve and near thirteen months since the bankrupt was so adjudicated, and now she first presents application for discharge.

The statute (Bankr. Act § 14a, 11 U.S.C.A. § 32(a) provides that the application may be filed "after the expiration of one month and within twelve months, subsequent" to adjudication; but not thereafter unless "it shall be made to appear to the judge that the bankrupt was unavoidably prevented from filing it within such time," whereupon "it may be filed within but not after the expiration of the next six months."

In endeavor to make it appear a case of unavoidable prevention, one of her counsel makes affidavit he erroneously advised her the application need not be filed before this time; that she relied thereon; that affiant "honestly and mistakenly believed" his advice was right; and that only now has he discovered his mistake.

"Unavoidably prevented" and their context are plain and prohibitive words, and it is held their mandate cannot be evaded by mistake or, in other words, neglect of counsel; that otherwise the court would abuse discretion and violate the statutory policy of diligence in bankruptcy; and that the statute and its terms bind courts as well as bankrupts.

See In re Goldstein (D.C.) 40 F.2d 539, and citations; In re Taylor (C.C.A.) 22 F.2d 499; In re Balzer (D.C.) 12 F.2d 94.

Accordingly, leave to file must be and is denied.


Summaries of

In re Adams

United States District Court, D. Montana
Feb 4, 1933
12 F. Supp. 755 (D. Mont. 1933)
Case details for

In re Adams

Case Details

Full title:In re ADAMS

Court:United States District Court, D. Montana

Date published: Feb 4, 1933

Citations

12 F. Supp. 755 (D. Mont. 1933)

Citing Cases

In re Berghorst

        Careful examination of the cases cited in briefs of counsel leads the court to the clear conclusion…

Cohen v. Keller

Perhaps the stern logic of In re Taylor, 2 Cir., 22 F.2d 499, pressed to its end, may suggest a different…