From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In Matter of A.M.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin
Mar 13, 2003
No. 03-02-00797-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 13, 2003)

Opinion

No. 03-02-00797-CV.

Filed: March 13, 2003.

Appeal from the District Court of Williamson County, 395th Judicial District, No. 01-303-J395, Honorable Ken Anderson, Judge Presiding.

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction.

Before Chief Justice LAW, Justices B. A. SMITH and PURYEAR.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Appellant filed a notice of appeal in this cause. However, this Court has now been notified that appellant's motion for new trial has been granted. The effect of the grant of a motion for new trial is to set aside all proceedings and reinstate the cause on the docket as if it had not been tried. See City of Dallas v. Ormsby, 904 S.W.2d 707, 712-13 (Tex.App.-Amarillo 1995, writ denied); State Dep't of Highways and Pub. Transp. v. Ross, 718 S.W.2d 5, 11 (Tex.App.-Tyler 1986, orig. proceeding). Accordingly, there is no longer a final judgment from which an appeal may be pursued. In the absence of a final judgment, this Court lacks jurisdiction. North E. Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Aldridge, 400 S.W.2d 893, 895 (Tex. 1966). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Tex.R.App.P. 42.3(a).


Summaries of

In Matter of A.M.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin
Mar 13, 2003
No. 03-02-00797-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 13, 2003)
Case details for

In Matter of A.M.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of A.M

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin

Date published: Mar 13, 2003

Citations

No. 03-02-00797-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 13, 2003)