From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Imperial Lumber Co. v. James Knowles

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Sep 29, 1972
267 So. 2d 53 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)

Opinion

No. 72-308.

September 29, 1972.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Pinellas County, Ben F. Overton, J.

Monterey Campbell, of Tomasello, Campbell Dunlap, Bartow, for appellant.

James D. Eckert, of Baynard, McLeod, Lang Eckert, St. Petersburg, for appellee.


We have examined the record, the briefs and particularly the final judgment entered by the trial judge and note that the judgment comes to this court clothed with a presumption of correctness. We observe that appellate courts cannot substitute their judgment for that of the trial court and no reversible error having been made to appear the judgment is therefore affirmed, including paragraph six of the final judgment.

PIERCE, C.J., and LILES and MANN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Imperial Lumber Co. v. James Knowles

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Sep 29, 1972
267 So. 2d 53 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)
Case details for

Imperial Lumber Co. v. James Knowles

Case Details

Full title:IMPERIAL LUMBER COMPANY, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT, v. JAMES…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Sep 29, 1972

Citations

267 So. 2d 53 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)

Citing Cases

Horatio Enterprises, Inc. v. Rabin

First, it is not the function of an appellate court to reevaluate the evidence and substitute its judgment…

Helman v. Seaboard Coast Line R. Co.

First, it is not the function of an appellate court to reevaluate the evidence and substitute its judgment…