From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Imperial Irrigation District v. Rainey

Supreme Court of California
Nov 30, 1932
216 Cal. 790 (Cal. 1932)

Opinion

Docket No. L.A. 12869.

November 30, 1932.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Imperial County. Lloyd E. Griffin, Judge. Affirmed.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

D.B. Roberts and Charles L. Childers for Appellant.

Elbert W. Davis, J.H. Hoffman and Albert A. Rosenshine for Respondent.


THE COURT.

Edward Rainey, as Superintendent of the Banks of the State of California, and trustee in charge of liquidation of Farmers and Merchants Bank of Imperial, was substituted in the place and stead of Albert A. Rosenshine, formerly superintendent of banks. [1] The instant action involves precisely the same issues of fact and questions of law as are presented by its companion case No. L.A. 12870 [ Wood v. Imperial Irr. Dist.], ante, p. 748 [17 Page 791 P.2d 128], this day decided. There is no question of law or issue of fact presented by this case that was not determined and decided in said companion case. This being so, the judgment of the trial court in dismissing the cause on the ground that there was pending in the Superior Court of the State of California, in and for the County of Imperial, another action, to wit, case No. L.A. 12870 [ Wood v. Imperial Irr. Dist., ante, p. 748 [ 17 P.2d 128], this day decided, between the same parties and upon the same issues of law and fact, must be and is hereby affirmed.

It is so ordered.

Shenk, J., being disqualified, did not participate.


Summaries of

Imperial Irrigation District v. Rainey

Supreme Court of California
Nov 30, 1932
216 Cal. 790 (Cal. 1932)
Case details for

Imperial Irrigation District v. Rainey

Case Details

Full title:IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT, Appellant, v. EDWARD RAINEY, as…

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Nov 30, 1932

Citations

216 Cal. 790 (Cal. 1932)
17 P.2d 134