From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Imling v. Port Auth. of N.Y. and New Jersey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 18, 2001
289 A.D.2d 104 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

4803-4804

December 18, 2001.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara Kapnick, J.), entered October 6, 2000, dismissing the complaint pursuant to an order, same court and Justice, entered on or about July, 12, 2000, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the brief, denied plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of defendant's liability under Labor Law § 240(1), and granted defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs' causes of action based thereon, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeal from the aforesaid order unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed within the appeal from the judgment.

Paul F. McAloon, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Fred E. Scharf, for defendants-respondents.

Before: Sullivan, P.J., Rosenberger, Nardelli, Rubin, Friedman, JJ.


Plaintiff, an airline mechanic employed by American Airlines, alleges that he was injured when he fell from a ladder while making repairs to an American Airlines jet. Defendant Port Authority leases the airport from the City of New York and subleased the hangar space where plaintiff was injured to American Airlines. Plaintiff's Labor Law § 240(1) claim against the Port Authority was properly dismissed since American Airlines was not a general contractor hired by the Port Authority but rather a sub-lessee operating its own business and servicing its own equipment on the leased premises (see, Guzman v. L.M.P. Realty Corp., 262 A.D.2d 99), and there is no evidence otherwise tending to show that the Port Authority had the right or authority to control the work site (see, Bart v. Universal Pictures, 277 A.D.2d 4, 5).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Imling v. Port Auth. of N.Y. and New Jersey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 18, 2001
289 A.D.2d 104 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Imling v. Port Auth. of N.Y. and New Jersey

Case Details

Full title:ANTON IMLING, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. THE PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 18, 2001

Citations

289 A.D.2d 104 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
734 N.Y.S.2d 163

Citing Cases

Durando v. City of New York

, primarily directed at the conditions on the premises, and not the work performed by GMD Shipyard, are…

Durando v. City of New York

With respect to GMD Enterprises, none of the evidence submitted by plaintiff addresses its role. Accordingly,…