From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Imex Discovery Resources, Inc. v. Allstate Hosiery Mills, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 5, 1989
156 A.D.2d 137 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

December 5, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Burton Sherman, J.).


The court properly exercised its discretion in imposing monetary sanctions for defendant's failure to provide responses to discovery notices. Defendant's explanation that the delay was the result of its president's death three months prior to service of the discovery notice was insufficient, especially because defendant failed to avail itself of statutory remedies provided for circumstances where timely response is impossible. The court was therefore fully justified in imposing the monetary sanctions. (Oppenheim Macnow v Worth, 103 A.D.2d 687.)

Concur — Ross, J.P., Asch, Milonas, Ellerin and Wallach, JJ.


Summaries of

Imex Discovery Resources, Inc. v. Allstate Hosiery Mills, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 5, 1989
156 A.D.2d 137 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

Imex Discovery Resources, Inc. v. Allstate Hosiery Mills, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:IMEX DISCOVERY RESOURCES, INC., Respondent, v. ALLSTATE HOSIERY MILLS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 5, 1989

Citations

156 A.D.2d 137 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
548 N.Y.S.2d 183

Citing Cases

Lis v. Lancaster

id not preclude the court from finding that the alleged willful misconduct constituted frivolous misconduct…

317 West 87 Associates v. Dannenberg

The sanctions were also appropriate under CPLR 3126. (See, e.g., Imex Discovery Resources v Allstate Hosiery…