Opinion
Case No. CV 11-04091 DDP (FFMx)
08-22-2011
IMB REO LLC, Plaintiff, v. MOE SAKI, Defendant.
cc: order, docket, remand letter
to Los Angeles Superior Court, Van Nuys
No. 10 B 03129
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND
[Motion filed on 7/13/11]
Presently before the court is Plaintiff's Motion to Remand. Because Defendant has not filed an opposition, the court GRANTS the motion.
Central District of California Local Rule 7-9 requires an opposing party to file an opposition to any motion at least twenty-one (21) days prior to the date designated for hearing the motion. C.D. CAL. L.R. 7-9. Additionally, Local Rule 7-12 provides that "[t]he failure to file any required paper, or the failure to file it within the deadline, may be deemed consent to the granting or denial of the motion." C.D. CAL. L.R. 7-12.
The hearing on Plaintiff's motion was set for August 22, 2011. Defendant's opposition was therefore due by August 8, 2011. As of the date of this Order, Defendant has not filed an opposition, or any other filing that could be construed as a request for a continuance. Accordingly, the court deems Defendant's failure to oppose as consent to granting the motion to remand, and GRANTS the motion.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DEAN D. PREGERSON
United States District Judge