Ijaoba v. Holder

5 Citing cases

  1. Jimenez v. Hardin

    Case No: 2:17-cv-629-FtM-99CM (M.D. Fla. Apr. 17, 2018)

    Therefore, Petitioner's claim was resolved when she was removed from ICE custody. Because Petitioner was released from custody pending removal from the United States, the chances of her extended detention happening again are too speculative to create a controversy sufficient to support a claim for relief, and the exception to the mootness doctrine does not apply. See Ijaoba v. Holder, Case No. 4:12-cv-3792-JHH-RRA, 2013 WL 1490927, at *1 (N.D. Ala. 2013) (holding "[s]ince the petitioner has been released pending his deportation to Nigeria, the circumstances of this case happening again are too speculative to create an actual controversy sufficient to support a claim for relief."). Since the Court can no longer give Petitioner any meaningful relief, her ยง 2241 Petition is moot and "dismissal is required because mootness is jurisdictional."

  2. Ramirez v. Sessions

    Case No: 2:18-cv-70-FtM-29CM (M.D. Fla. Mar. 22, 2018)

    Because Petitioner was released from custody pending removal from the United States, the chances of his extended detention happening again are too speculative to create a controversy sufficient to support a claim for relief, and the exception to the mootness doctrine does not apply. See Ijaoba v. Holder, Case No. 4:12-cv-3792-JHH-RRA, 2013 WL 1490927, at *1 (N.D. Ala. 2013) (holding "[s]ince the petitioner has been released pending his deportation to Nigeria, the circumstances of this case happening again are too speculative to create an actual controversy sufficient to support a claim for relief."). Since the Court can no longer give Petitioner any meaningful relief, his ยง 2241 Petition is moot and "dismissal is required because mootness is jurisdictional."

  3. Hui v. Kelly

    Case No. 4:17-cv-00276-VEH-SGC (N.D. Ala. May. 8, 2017)

    Because Petitioner has been released, the court can no longer provide meaningful relief. Thus, the court finds that the petition for writ of habeas corpus is moot. See Weinstein v. Bradford, 423 U.S. 147, 149 (1975); Ijaoba v. Holder, 4:12-cv-03792-JHH-RRA, 2013 WL 1490927 at *1 (N.D. Ala. 2013). Accordingly, Respondents' motion to dismiss is due to be granted, and the petition is due to be dismissed.

  4. Ferias v. Lynch

    Case No: 2:16-cv-811-FtM-99MRM (M.D. Fla. Apr. 3, 2017)

    Because Petitioner was released pending removal, the chances of her extended detention happening again are too speculative to create a controversy sufficient to support a claim for relief, and the exception to the mootness doctrine does not apply. See Ijaoba v. Holder, Case No. 4:12-cv-3792-JHH-RRA, 2013 WL 1490927, at *1 (N.D. Ala. 2013) ("Since the petitioner has been released pending his deportation to Nigeria, the circumstances of this case happening again are too speculative to create an actual controversy sufficient to support a claim for relief."). III. CONCLUSION

  5. Torrealba v. Lynch

    Case No: 2:16-cv-723-FtM-99MRM (M.D. Fla. Dec. 20, 2016)

    Because Petitioner was released pending removal, the chances of her extended detention happening again are too speculative to create a controversy sufficient to support a claim for relief, and the exception to the mootness doctrine does not apply. See Ijaoba v. Holder, Case No. 4:12-cv-3792-JHH-RRA, 2013 WL 1490927, at *1 (N.D. Ala. 2013) ("Since the petitioner has been released pending his deportation to Nigeria, the circumstances of this case happening again are too speculative to create an actual controversy sufficient to support a claim for relief."). III. CONCLUSION