From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Igbinoba v. Accura Eng'g & Consulting Servs.

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jun 28, 2024
No. A24A1695 (Ga. Ct. App. Jun. 28, 2024)

Opinion

A24A1695

06-28-2024

OSA IGBINOBA v. ACCURA ENGINEERING AND CONSULTING SERVICES, INC.


The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

In this action for breach of contract and related claims, the trial court entered a final judgment awarding the plaintiff a total of $9,600 plus unspecified court costs. Pro se defendant Osa Igbinoba then filed this direct appeal. We lack jurisdiction.

Appeals in actions for damages in which the judgment is $10,000 or less must be initiated by filing an application for discretionary review. OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (6), (b); Jennings v. Moss, 235 Ga.App. 357, 357 (509 S.E.2d 655) (1998). "Compliance with the discretionary appeals procedure is jurisdictional." Smoak v. Dept. of Human Resources, 221 Ga.App. 257, 257 (471 S.E.2d 60) (1996). Igbinoba's failure to comply with the discretionary review procedure deprives us of jurisdiction over this direct appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED. See Jennings, 235 Ga.App. at 357.


Summaries of

Igbinoba v. Accura Eng'g & Consulting Servs.

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jun 28, 2024
No. A24A1695 (Ga. Ct. App. Jun. 28, 2024)
Case details for

Igbinoba v. Accura Eng'g & Consulting Servs.

Case Details

Full title:OSA IGBINOBA v. ACCURA ENGINEERING AND CONSULTING SERVICES, INC.

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Jun 28, 2024

Citations

No. A24A1695 (Ga. Ct. App. Jun. 28, 2024)