From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Iengo v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jun 5, 1996
686 So. 2d 13 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

No. 94-03468.

June 5, 1996.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pasco County; Craig C. Villanti, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Karen Kinney, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Wendy Buffington, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


We affirm appellant's judgment and sentence. We strike, however, condition 9 of the orders of probation and community control because it is a special condition which was not orally pronounced at sentencing. Nank v. State, 646 So.2d 762 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). We also strike the words "at your own expense" from condition 10 for the same reason. Luby v. State, 648 So.2d 308 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).

Affirmed as modified.

THREADGILL, A.C.J., and FRANK and LAZZARA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Iengo v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jun 5, 1996
686 So. 2d 13 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

Iengo v. State

Case Details

Full title:VALERIE IENGO, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jun 5, 1996

Citations

686 So. 2d 13 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)