From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Iconic Images Ltd. v. Ronseblatt

United States District Court, Central District of California
Oct 13, 2022
2:22-cv-02390-SPG-JPR (C.D. Cal. Oct. 13, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-02390-SPG-JPR

10-13-2022

Iconic Images Ltd. v. Andrew L. Ronseblatt


Present: The Honorable SHERILYN PEACE GARNETT, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Proceedings:[In Chambers] Order To Show Cause Re: Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution

Plaintiff(s) are ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962) (Court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion).

The below time period(s) has not been met. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before October 28, 2022, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. This matter will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff(s) response. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78. Failure to respond will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action.

Plaintiff(s) obtained entry of default as to Defendant Andrew L. Rosenblatt, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 55(a), but Plaintiff(s) have not sought default judgment, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 55(b). Plaintiff(s) can satisfy this order by seeking default judgment or by notifying the Court that default judgment will not be sought, at which point the clerk will close this matter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Iconic Images Ltd. v. Ronseblatt

United States District Court, Central District of California
Oct 13, 2022
2:22-cv-02390-SPG-JPR (C.D. Cal. Oct. 13, 2022)
Case details for

Iconic Images Ltd. v. Ronseblatt

Case Details

Full title:Iconic Images Ltd. v. Andrew L. Ronseblatt

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Oct 13, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-02390-SPG-JPR (C.D. Cal. Oct. 13, 2022)