I.C. v. SmithKline Beecham Corp.

Full title: I.C., a Minor, by MARIA PINO and THOMAS CINTAO, Guardians, and MARIA PINO…

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Oct 9, 2013

CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-3681 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 9, 2013)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-3681

2013-10-09

I.C., a Minor, by MARIA PINO and THOMAS CINTAO, Guardians, and MARIA PINO and THOMAS CINTAO, Individually Plaintiffs, v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION d/b/a GLAXOSMITHKLINE, Defendant

RONALD L. BUCKWALTER

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Before the court is defendant's motion to transfer venue. Substantially similar motions have been ruled upon and granted by judges of this court as recently as August 14, 2013 (Judge Bartle) and August 16, 2013 (Judge McLaughlin).

Plaintiffs' response to defendant's motion is boilerplate in many aspects (see pages 7-12 of its brief in this case and pages 7-12 in 13cv3695) and does not address the cases decided against it (supra).

I adopt the analysis of Judges Bartle and McLaughlin and enter the following order:

AND NOW, this 9^th day of October, 2013, upon consideration of Defendant's Motion to Transfer Venue, and the responses filed thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that said Motion (Docket No. 2) is GRANTED, and this case is TRANSFERRED to the Southern District of Florida.

BY THE COURT:

_____________

RONALD L. BUCKWALTER, S. J.