Opinion
Case No. 3:12-cv-1019
10-22-2012
Judge Sharp
ORDER
On the same day the Court entered an order dismissing the complaint for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction (ECF No. 4), plaintiff Shemeka Ibrahim filed a First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 7), apparently to correct grammatical errors in the original complaint.
To the extent the amended complaint might be construed as a motion for permission to amend the complaint or as a motion to reconsider dismissal of the case, such motion, however construed, is without merit and is hereby DENIED AS MOOT. The proposed amendment does not affect the fundamental defect in the original complaint, as it too fails to state a claim over which this Court has subject-matter jurisdiction.
It is so ORDERED.
___________
Kevin H. Sharp
United States District Judge